From the Cato Institute, pointage to the state of government-sponsored health care in the UK. The article provides startling and frightening insight into the false economies that inevitably result from government intervention in areas where they don’t belong. Apparently, UK hospitals are being forced to introduce minimum waiting times, as long as 120 days in some cases, for treatment of non-emergency, non-cancerous conditions. Because payments to hospitals are fixed by the government, the more productive health care facilities are forced to cut back on service, to avoid exceeding the government-mandated budget for the current year. From the article:
After years of Government targets pushing them to cut waiting lists, staff are now being warned against “over-performing” by treating patients too quickly. The Sunday Telegraph has learned that at least six trusts have imposed the minimum times.
In March, Patricia Hewitt, the Secretary of State for Health, offered her apparent blessing for the minimum waiting times by announcing they would be “appropriate” in some cases. Amid fears about £1.27 billion of NHS debts, she expressed concern that some hospitals were so productive “they actually got ahead of what the NHS could afford”.
….
Doctors are also resigning. One gynæcologist said that he spent more time doing sudoku puzzles than treating patients because of the measures.
And if you think that can’t happen here, the California assembly passed legislation which would have established state-run health care for the Golden State, funded, of course by
… an 8 percent payroll tax and a 3 percent individual income tax.
To his credit, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has announced he will veto the measure.
A close call; but be forewarned, we haven’t heard the last of such nonsense.
-k-
Technorati Tags: california, healthcare, Schwarzenegger , universalhealthcare