The First Amendment Takes Another One on the Chin

This time, via the Federal Election Commission. Back in 2004, NASCAR Nextel Cup driver Kirk Shelmerdine had a “Bush/Cheney 2004” sticker on the rear quarter panel of the car for 4 of the final 10 races of the 2004 season. The placement of the sticker was not authorized by the Bush/Cheney campaign, nor did the campaign pay to have Shelmerdine display the decal. Because Kirk Shelmerdine Racing is a Limited Liability Corporation, a complaint was filed with the FEC:

… complaint the FEC received from one Sydnor Thompson that Kirk Shelmerdine had improperly committed an independent expenditure on behalf of the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign during the 2004 race.

This complaint mentioned that there was no disclaimer that Kirk was displaying the decals of his own volition, and sought some huge fines and penalties.

OK, let me tell you about Kirk Shelmerdine. I’ll always remember him as the crew chief for the late, great Dale Earnhardt. Kirk always wanted to go racing on his own, and left Richard Childress Racing several years back. Kirk’s team is drastically underfunded; car sponsors, when they are to be found at all, are not high rollers themselves, nor are they usually repeat sponsors. So Kirk, sponsorless for the 4 races in question, put the Bush/Cheney decals on the car to draw attention to himself, his car, and his race team, in hopes of attracting sponsorship money. The very fact that he even occasionally makes the field of 43 is remarkable. He never runs particularly well, but even 40th place money is a bunch to someone who can squeeze the nickels he way he can; he’s eking out a living, and doing what he wants.

Back to the complaint in question; the FEC spent months trying to value the space on the car that was occupied by the offending decals. As a market guy, I can tell you: zero. The simple fact that no sponsors stepped up for any of these races should indicate the space’s value. And, does anyone really think that had some sponsor offered him $50K to carry their signage, that Kirk would still have had Bush/Cheney decalomania on the car for free? Kirk’s a businessman, I’m sure he can do the math. With no sponsors, he put the campaign materials on his car as a statement.

So after months of FEC hand-wringing and navel-gazing, they let Kirk off with something called a “letter of admonishment”, which means “we think we could have fined the shit out of you, but we’ll cut you some slack this time. Pull that crap again, and we’ll whack you in the wallet.”

From Mark Tapscott’s post. which was quoted briefly above, these observations:

If you still wonder why I believe this case is so important, think about this: What is the difference between Kirk Shelmerdine’s race car as his equipment for making a living and the pickup truck driven by the plumber or housing contractor?

The contractor with a Kerry-Edwards or Bush-Cheney bumper sticker on his back bumper and driving down I-95 or just about any other public road in America will be seen by far more people than Shelmerdine’s “field filler” race car at four NASCAR events.

It’s the same “independent expenditure,” but it has more impact than the Shelmerdine sticker, so what’s to keep Congress from next directing the FEC to “admonish” every contractor, plumber, electrician, etc. etc. in America to get those bumper stickers off their pickups?

Indeed. It looks like we’re entering yet another “Year of the Chickenshit.”

-k-
Linkage to Kirk Shelmerdine Racing. From the looks of it, his sponsorship woes are maybe a little less severe. Good.

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Ex-Speaker, Current Rambler

I hate to post some more from Newt Gingrich, but here is more detail on his First Amendment views:

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich yesterday in Manchester said the country will be forced to reexamine freedom of speech to meet the threat of terrorism.

Gingrich, speaking at a Manchester awards banquet, said a “different set of rules” may be needed to reduce terrorists’ ability to use the Internet and free speech to recruit and get out their message.

“We need to get ahead of the curve before we actually lose a city, which I think could happen in the next decade,” said Gingrich, a Republican who helped engineer the GOP’s takeover of Congress in 1994.

Talk about pandering and fear-mongering. Freedoms apply to all; even to those groups and views we’d most like to suppress. That’s why they’re called freedoms. We can reason, we can argue, but until someone acts on their views, and breaks the law, they are free to express them.

Read the rest of the article; Newt is losing it big-time.

-k-

Technorati Tags:

Presented as a Public Service

Presented without any drollery by yours truly, the text of the Bill of Rights, on its 215th birthday:

Amendment [I] Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment [II] A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment [III] No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment [IV] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment [V] No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

Amendment [VI] In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining Witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.

Amendment [VII] In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment [VIII] Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment [IX] The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment [X] The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Technorati Tags:

DirecTV Channel 212

That would be the NFL Channel, on which Baltimore and Cincinnati are now playing the Thursday Night game. I don’t care much about the outcome of the game, I just wanted to see whether DirecTV carried it. I missed the Kansas City Chieves (against Denver at that) on Thanksgiving night, because my brother-in-law’s cable company doesn’t carry the NFL Channel.

The NFL wants money and lots of exposure for the channel, evidently more than the CableCos are ready to fork over at the moment. Aside from being an argument for switching to satellite, it’s a classic case of the market at work. No one has a “right” to see a sporting event, and as a customer in the market, an individual can either petition the NFL and Cable, forget the whole thing, or switch to satellite.

The above all sounds great until the Washington Redskins, or some other team favored by one of our congressional representatives, is relegated to an appearance on the NFL Channel. If cable doesn’t carry it, all sorts of pressure will be brought to bear on cable, the NFL, and anyone else they can think of, to preserve some “right” that isn’t a right at all.

-k-

Technorati Tags: ,

The Bums were not Thrown Out

According to Cato@Liberty, very few incumbents actually lost their offices last Tuesday. According to the post:

Consider that there were 435 races in the House and Senate with an incumbent trying to retain his or her seat. Only 26 – 6% — of challengers in these races have won. That’s pretty low for a “throw the bums out” election. Pending the outcome of three or four yet-to-be-determined races, this year’s 94% incumbent reelection rate appears to be slightly higher than the 90% rate of 1994.

So, before anyone celebrates “change”, “working in a bipartisan manner”, and other such-like euphemisms, remember that the new Bozos are a lot like the old. In most cases, it’s still the same Bozo. And we all know how that turned out.

-k-

Technorati Tags: , ,

Futbol

SWMBO and I watched a couple of NCAA Football games last night; the last part of Texas-Oklahoma, followed by Tennessee- Georgia. We enjoyed both games; our enjoyment was no doubt enhanced by both our chosen teams’ winding up victorious.

I observed that the NCAA has picked up one of the more disgusting customs of the NFL, that being the instant replay rule. The rule is seemingly invoked at random in NCAA, leading to umpteem replays of the play in question, and talking heads explaining in detail the fine points of the rule book as they apply to the situation.

Why, oh, why, is our Congress, Executive Branch, and governance in general, becoming more gamelike, while simultaneously our games require explanation by Philadelphia lawyers to make sure all calls are 100% correct?

What a country.

-k-

Technorati Tags:

The Tawdry Tale Continues

Wow, did former Rep. Mark Foley ever have a rough patch growing up.

So far, he has:

  • Checked into rehab, the traditional first step.
  • Admitted he’s gay.
  • Alleged that he was abused by a clergyman as a teen.
  • Yep, he’s throwing out anything to avoid responsibility for his own actions.

    If he reveals that his parents abandoned him, he’ll have the grand slam. If he also happens to be afraid of clowns, we’ll all be saying “That poor man.”

    -k-

    One less to vote out come November.

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    Thanks for Nothing, Congress

    From this article, emphasis mine:

    The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 was rammed through Congress by the Republican leadership in the final minutes before the election period recess. According to Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.), no one on the Senate-House Conference Committee had even seen the final language of the bill. The Act is title VIII of a completely unrelated bill, the Safe Port Act, HR 4954, dealing with port security.

    Is it just me, or is this country swirling around the drain a little faster than it was yesterday? In November, cast out these self-righteous, do-nothing, bumbling incompetent incumbents (pardon my redundancy).

    -k-

    Technorati Tags: , ,

    No Mas(s) Help

    The Big Dig debacle continues, from 2 billion to 14+ billion, for a public works project benefitting the few at the expense of the most. Plagued with overruns, institutional incompetence, and huge slabs of concrete killing citizens, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney wants to make it right, again on the backs of the US taxpayer.

    From this Boston Globe article:

    Romney said state transportation officials haven’t begun to estimate the cost of the repair work, but he said he made a pitch for federal assistance in a meeting yesterday with Senators Edward M. Kennedy and John F. Kerry and US Representative Michael E. Capuano.

    Followed by this:

    “I’d be embarrassed if I didn’t always ask for federal money whenever I got the chance,“ Romney quipped, saying he had asked for help in paying for a comprehensive safety review of the Big Dig, for which the state has allocated $20 million.

    He quipped? Nope, he wants his grubby ”Mitt“ in our pockets yet again. It is devoutly to be desired that our rollover Congress has the balls to vote down any further help for this project.

    -k-

    Technorati Tags: ,